Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0855

reference
839-tree-1
name
0855
tree-preservation-order

undefined

839-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.048541 50.858288)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.048441 50.858277,-1.048446 50.858297,-1.048460 50.858315,-1.048481 50.858329,-1.048509 50.858338,-1.048539 50.858341,-1.048570 50.858338,-1.048598 50.858330,-1.048620 50.858316,-1.048635 50.858298,-1.048640 50.858279,-1.048636 50.858260,-1.048622 50.858242,-1.048600 50.858228,-1.048573 50.858219,-1.048542 50.858215,-1.048511 50.858218,-1.048483 50.858227,-1.048461 50.858241,-1.048447 50.858258,-1.048441 50.858277)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL